Indonesia Economic Quarterly, June 2011 : Current Challenges, Future Potential
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indonesia's economic performance \n through mid-2011 has been positive. Solid growth has been \n accompanied by further portfolio capital and foreign direct \n investment inflows. Public and financial sector balance \n sheets remain strong. However, events over the past quarter \n serve as a reminder of a number of Indonesia's ongoing \n policy challenges. At the same time, the launch of the \n government's master plan 2011-2025 has focused \n attention on the investments and policy reforms which can \n help Indonesia reach its future growth potential. Finally, \n heightened international risk aversion originating from the \n Greek debt crisis, and the potential market implications of \n any haircut, were it to occur, are a reminder of the \n external shocks which could prompt reversals of short-term \n capital flows to Indonesia. However, events over the past \n quarter are a reminder of the current challenges which are \n faced and the need to put in place, and implement, the \n policies and investments necessary for Indonesia to reach \n its potential as a leading global growth driver of the next \n few decades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it