Intensive exposure to English language: an organizational proposal adapted to the Catalan Elementary Education system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aquest document és fruit d'un procés de recerca sobre les experiències que es duen a terme a Québec a l'escola Primària, on els alumnes de l'últim any es veuen exposats de manera intensiva a l'anglès com a llengua estrangera. Arran de la descoberta d'aquest model organitzatiu com a mesura de millora de l'adquisició i domini de la llengua a la regió Canadenca, es formula la hipòtesis : El programa d'anglès intensiu del Québec es pot adaptar a l'organització curricular de l'escola Primària catalana. \nPer respondre a aquesta afirmació, es realitza un estudi de compatibilitat horària segons el què estipula el Currículum de Primària i les bases teòriques sobre l'exposició intensiva a una llengua. Un cop confirmada la hipòtesis, es duu a terme una proposta d'adaptació \norganitzacional en base a les experiències, estudis i recerca realitzats fins ara. La proposta és avaluada per mestres d'anglès i una investigadora de l'àmbit de recerca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".