IKEDA TYPE CONSTRUCTION OF CUSP FORMS (Modular forms and automorphic representations)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a survey of results on the construction of holomorphic cusp forms on tube domains originally initiated by Ikeda [9].Besides a survey it includes conjectures and possible applications of our work [19]. INTRODUCTIONThere are five simple tube domains (cf. [6]).They are of the form $\mathfrak{D}=\{Z=X+iY|X\in$ $\mathbb{R}^{n},$ $Y\in C\}$ , where $C$ is a self-adjoint homogeneous cone in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ .Let $G$ be (the real points of) the simply connected, simple real algebraic group which acts transitively on $\mathfrak{D}$ .We list the group $G$ and the cone $C$ :(1) $Sp_{2n}$ (rank $n$ ) $;n\cross n$ positive definite matrices over $\mathbb{R}$ ;(2) $SU(n, n);n\cross n$ positive definite hermitian matrices over $\mathbb{C}$ ;(3) $SU(2n, H)=Spin^{*}(4n);n\cross n$ positive definite hermitian matrices over $H$ (quater- nions);(4) $SO(2, n)^{0}$ ; the cone in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ of $(x_{0}, \ldots, x_{n})$ with $x_{0}>(x_{1}^{2}+\cdots+x_{n}^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}$ ;(5) $E_{7,3};3\cross 3$ positive definite hermitian matrices over $\mathfrak{C}$ (Cayley numbers).It is an important problem to explicitly construct holomorphic cusp forms on $\mathfrak{D}$ with respect to $G(\mathbb{Z})$ (we will call such a modular form on $\mathfrak{D}$ "a level one form In particular, we focus on the lifting from normalized Hecke cusp eigenforms on the complex upper half-plane $\mathbb{H}$ with respect to $SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ to holomorphic cusp forms on $\mathfrak{D}.$Ikeda [9] (see also [8]) gave $a$ (functorial) construction of Siegel cusp forms of weight $n+k,$ $n\equiv k$ mod2 (so that $n+k$ is even) for $Sp_{4n}$ from normalized Hecke eigenforms in $S_{2k}(SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z}))$ which has been conjectured by Duke and Imamoglu (Independently Ibukiyama formulated a conjecture in terms of Koecher-Maass series).He made use of the uniform property of the Fourier coefficients of Siegel Eisenstein series for $Sp_{4n}$ and together with various deep facts established in [9] to prove Duke-Imamoglu conjecture.When $n=1$ , it is nothing but a Saito-Kurokawa lift.Since then, his construction was generalized to unitary
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".