Holistic Vehicle Control Using Learning MPC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, learning MPC schemes have been introduced to address these challenges of traditional MPC. They typically leverage different machine learning techniques to learn the system dynamics directly from data, allowing it to handle model uncertainty more effectively. Besides, they can adapt to changes by continuously updating the learned model using real-time data, ensuring that the controller remains effective even as the system evolves. However, there are some challenges for the existing learning MPC techniques. Firstly, learning-based control approaches often lack interpretability. Understanding and interpreting the learned models and their learning and prediction processes are crucial for safety critical systems such as vehicle stability systems. Secondly, existing learning MPC techniques rely solely on learned models, which might result in poor performance or instability if the model encounters scenarios that differ significantly from the training data. Thirdly, existing learning MPC techniques typically require large amounts of high-quality data for training accurate models, which can be expensive or impractical in the vehicle stability control domain. To address these challenges, this thesis proposes a novel hybrid learning MPC approach for HVC. The main objective is to leverage the capabilities of machine learning algorithms to learn accurate and adaptive models of vehicle dynamics from data, enabling enhanced control strategies for improved stability and maneuverability. The hybrid learning MPC scheme maintains a traditional physics-based vehicle model and a data-based learning model. In the learned model, a variety of machine-learning techniques can be used to predict vehicle dynamics based on learning from collected vehicle data. The performance of the developed hybrid learning MPC controller using torque vectoring (TV) as the actuator is evaluated through the Matlab/Simulink and CarSim co-simulation with a high-fidelity Chevy Equinox vehicle model under a series of harsh maneuvers. Extensive real-world experiments using a Chevy Equinox electric testing vehicle are conducted. Both simulation results and experimental results show that the developed hybrid learning MPC approach consistently outperforms existing MPC methods with better yaw rate tracking performance and smaller vehicle sideslip under various driving conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".