MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7057195849

Investigation of diversity of unusual pigments and novel photosynthetic apparatus in aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria

2017· dissertation· en· W7057195849 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnoxygenic photosynthesisPhototrophBacteriochlorophyllPhotosynthesisPigmentChromatiumRhodobacter sphaeroidesPurple bacteriaGreen sulfur bacteriaChlorosome
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photosynthetic complexes produced by aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs (AAP) Roseicyclus mahoneyensis, strain ML6, Chromocurvus halotolerans, EG19 and Charonomicrobium ambiphototrophicum, EG17 were studied to examine unusual pigments, proteins and photosynthetic function. We found ML6 spontaneously mutates to lose its light harvesting (LH) complex 2, or reaction centre (RC) and LH1, resulting in mutants ML6(BN9O), ML6(B) and ML6(DB). EG19 and EG17 contain a red-shifted LH1 complex, and EG17 is the first AAP known to photosynthesize both aerobically and anaerobically. From all organisms, membranes and complexes were purified. Flash induced difference spectra revealed ML6, ML6(BN9O), EG19 and EG17 were photosynthetically active aerobically, though only EG17 was capable of rapid electron transport without oxygen. ML6(B) and ML6(DB) were not capable of photosynthesis. Action spectra universally showed that bacteriochlorophyll and bacteriopheophytin were the primary LH pigments and carotenoids were not involved in photosynthesis. Redox midpoint potentials of the QA, P+ and RC-bound cytochrome were typical of AAP, except for the QA of EG17 (+5mV, between what is expected for AAP and anaerobic purple non-sulfur bacteria). RC, LH1 and LH2 subunits were of typical sizes. The exception was the LH1 of EG19 and EG17, which was slightly larger than previously published. Strain EG19 excretes an orange-brown compound into the growth medium, previously hypothesized to be a siderophore. We identified it as a catechol siderophore, measuring approximately 800Da. It is hydrophilic and may contain the amino acids valine, proline, aspartate, 2-aminobutenoic acid, and N-acetyl-L-glutamate. Lastly, a sampling trip to Central Gold Mine, Nopiming Provincial Park, Canada was undertaken to study the presence of AAP in this extreme environment. Abundant AAP were found and five were chosen for study: strains NM4.16, NM4.18, C4, C9, and C11. All are mesophiles, grow on complex media, and tolerate a wide range of pH, temperature and salinity. Isolates were highly resistant to the toxic metalloid oxides tellurite, tellurate, selenite, selenate, metavanadate and orthometavanadate and reduced tellurite to tellurium. All are α-Proteobacteria, with C4 and NM4.16 closely related to Porphyrobacter colymbi (99.4% and 99.7% sequence similarity, respectively), C9 to Brevundimonas variabilis (99.1%), C11 to Brevundimonas bacteroides (98.6%), and NM4.18 to Erythromonas ursincola (98.5%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→