MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057209885

Indigenous language preservation through collaborative open-access attempts: the example of the Wikipedia project of the Atikamekw Nation

2019· article· en· W7057209885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPresentation (obstetrics)Language revitalizationIndigenous languageFirst languageWeb site
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Manawan, an Indigenous community in Canada, the presenter has initiated a school project in 2013 to create a Wikipedia in the local language Atikamekw, spoken by 8,000 people. Today, the Wikipedia in Atikamekw has many regular native editors and is used in the Atikamekw schools, the Atikamekw institutions and at home. The aim of this presentation is to communicate the importance of endangered languages existing on the web to be regularly used. (session 3.6.5)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0240.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.012
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicPulsed Power Technology ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207