Intraspecific variation in the mating system of the male grey seal: relating phenotype, behaviour and success
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude a mesuré l'étendue et le succès des variations comportementales du système d'accouplement chez le phoque gris male. Elle a été conduite sur l'île de Sable, Canada, pendant 6 saisons de reproduction. L'étude a révélé des variations comportementales plus importantes que précédemment documenté. Le succès a été évalué pour deux tactiques d'accouplement. La tactique principale (dite du conjoint) a peu de succès mais elle s'avère plus performante que la tactique alternative (opportuniste). Quelques jeunes mâles utilisent la tactique principale et d'autres plus âges à la fois la tactique principale et celle alternative. Les mâles 'conjoints' sont plus corpulents, disposent de plus de réserves énergétiques et prolongent leur reproduction, suggérant que l'état est plus important que l'âge dans la détermination de la performance. Les tactiques alternatives d'accouplement pourraient avoir d'importantes dans le schéma des flux géniques et de la sélection sexuelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".