I capitelli figurati di Brindisi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since their discovery in 1950-52, the two figured capitals actually kept in the Museo Archelogico F.Ribezzo in Brindisi have been the subject of many studies. no agreement has been so far reached as to their dating and the identification of the heads. a cross-over focus on their stylistic characters and historical background as well as of the local myths supports a dating to the third quarter of the II centry B.C. and suggest the heads belong to eigth deities of the Dionysos circle, arranged in couples. The capitals most likely come from a temple on the arx; the role of this temple was accomplish the civic function of poliadism, strictly tied to the rituals enacting the achievement of adult age. So, the themes of fire and wine they represent hint at the daily as well political activities of a tigth community of citizens. Finally, in an age of political transition, the two-faced relgious feelig of this community of citizens. Finally, in a age of political transition, the two-faced religous feeling of this Graeco-Roman community is reflected in the locally well attested adoption of Greek deities into the Roman religion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".