Il Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 dello Stato di Victoria, Australia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nel giugno 2016, dopo una storica decisione della sua Corte Suprema, il Canada aveva legiferato sul tema delle scelte di fine vita, riconoscendo il diritto del malato terminale di morire con l’aiuto del medico. Nel novembre 2017 lo Stato australiano di Victoria, con il Voluntary Assisted Dying Act − oggetto di analisi nel presente articolo −, è intervenuto con una legislazione analoga che consente ai malati terminali – anche qui, sottoponendoli a rigidi protocolli e controlli – di accedere tanto al suicidio medicalmente assistito quanto all’eutanasia volontaria. \nIn June 2016, after an historic decision of the Supreme Court, Canada enacted a law regarding end of life choices, recognizing the right of the terminally ill persons to receive medical assistance to die. In Novem-ber 2017 the Australian State of Victoria, with the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act (analyzed in this article), followed that path with a legislation that allows – under strict rules and controls – both medically assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia of terminally ill persons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".