MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057318018

Il Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 dello Stato di Victoria, Australia

2018· article· it· W7057318018 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Research Information System (University of Udine) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationTerminally illSupreme courtAssisted suicideRight to lifeState (computer science)Government (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nel giugno 2016, dopo una storica decisione della sua Corte Suprema, il Canada aveva legiferato sul tema delle scelte di fine vita, riconoscendo il diritto del malato terminale di morire con l’aiuto del medico. Nel novembre 2017 lo Stato australiano di Victoria, con il Voluntary Assisted Dying Act − oggetto di analisi nel presente articolo −, è intervenuto con una legislazione analoga che consente ai malati terminali – anche qui, sottoponendoli a rigidi protocolli e controlli – di accedere tanto al suicidio medicalmente assistito quanto all’eutanasia volontaria.
\nIn June 2016, after an historic decision of the Supreme Court, Canada enacted a law regarding end of life choices, recognizing the right of the terminally ill persons to receive medical assistance to die. In Novem-ber 2017 the Australian State of Victoria, with the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act (analyzed in this article), followed that path with a legislation that allows – under strict rules and controls – both medically assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia of terminally ill persons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Research Information System (University of Udine)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207