INFLUJO DE LAS ALERTAS DE VIAJE EN UN CONTEXTO DE INSEGURIDAD INTERNACIONAL. El caso de Mazatlán, Sinaloa (México)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Influence of Travel Alerts in a Context of International Insecurity. The Case of Mazatlán,\nSinaloa (México). From the 21st century, security became one of the most influential indicators when\nplanning a trip. Since then the different national states have established policies and mechanisms to\ninform and warn their citizens about the danger or risk that exists when traveling to other places around\nthe world, with murder being the item with the greatest weight when issuing such official notices. This\narticle evaluates the effect produced by a travel alert between the flow of North American and Canadian\nvisitors to a Mexican tourist destination through different tourism indicators and the number of homicides\nregistered between 2006 and 2016, through econometric techniques such as the multiple linear\nregression method. Among the results it is possible to demonstrate the relationship between homicides\nwith hotel occupancy and the percentage of occupancy of domestic and foreign tourists in the tourist port of Mazatlan, Mexico, as well as statistical evidence that this type of crime influences the flow of\ninternational visitors to the destination in a moderate way, but not in their permanence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".