MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7057390781

IT Providing a Path From Research to Practice - Promoting Use of Environmentally Friendly Cement and Concrete in Construction

2002· article· en· W7057390781 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Army Corps of EngineersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsDurabilityDisseminationEnvironmentally friendlyUser FriendlyPath (computing)Sustainable developmentInformation systemField (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developments in IT are rapidly changing the ways in which we communicate research results to provide timely technology transfer to the construction industry. This paper presents a computer database and a Web-based information system that were developed to disseminate the results of a long-term CANMET and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers studies on the durability of marine concrete incorporating supplementary cementations materials. These information systems provide tools to visualize the results of extensive field studies and support an informed decision-making on the choice of environmentally - friendly concrete for marine projects. The paper discusses some issues associated with the design and maintenance of concrete durability information systems and the need to develop a Web portal for Sustainable Development of Cement and Concrete that would provide collaborative environment for concrete researchers all over the world to share information on concrete durability, provide on-line training materials for construction companies, and offer professional services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→