MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057440632

Kate Bezanson. Gender, The State, and Social Reproduction: Household Insecurity in Neo-Liberal Times\n

2008· article· en· W7057440632 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueJournals @ The Mount (Mount Saint Vincent University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian StudiesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringState (computer science)Welfare stateSubsidyIdeologySocial protectionWelfarePovertySocial policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book highlights the ideologies and influences of changes made to our social welfare state that are associated with neo-liberalism and neo-conservativism and how these changes directly impact the lives of the most vulnerable members of our communities.When the Conservative government, led by Mike Harris, took hold of Ontario in 1995, households that were merely getting by found themselves scrambling to make ends meet.The complete restructuring of key institutions such as education and health care, and drastic cuts in funding for policies such as social assistance and state subsidized child care spaces during this time, resulted in low-income households, and particularly women, being forced to absorb the consequences of these "adjustments."The interview data in this book stems from the Speaking Out research project that investigated the effects of the Ontario Conservative's "Common Sense Revolution" and is poignantly used to illustrate its devastating effects.33.1, 2008 www.msvu.ca/atlantismembers and service users alike.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournals @ The Mount (Mount Saint Vincent University)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207