MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057561527

Knockout mouse model generated by CRISPR technology to study the function of BSP proteins on male fertility in vivo

2019· other· en· W7057561527 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsCRISPRFunction (biology)Male fertilityIn vivoFertilityLoss function
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infertility is a worldwide problem that affects 15% of couples, with male and female factors contributing equally to cases of infertility.The cause of male infertility in half of the cases is unknown.A series of coordinated cellular events are responsible for sperm-egg interaction and successful fertilization.Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms involved in sperm production and maturation is critical to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility, as well as Based on these results, we conclude that BSP proteins, individually or together, are not essential for proper sperm function and fertilization in mice, and the absence of these proteins does not affect male fertility.Further studies could provide a better understanding of the mechanisms involved and possible pathways by which BSP proteins could be involved in regulating pup weight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)Same topicPulsed Power Technology ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207