MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7057594470

Information Access Using Neural Networks For Diverse Domains And Sources

2023· dissertation· en· W7057594470 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsQuestion answeringFocus (optics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Information accessData accessAdaptation (eye)Natural languageReading (process)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ever-increasing volume of web-based documents poses a challenge in efficiently accessing specialized knowledge from domain-specific sources, requiring a profound understanding of the domain and substantial comprehension effort. Although natural language technologies, such as information retrieval and machine reading compression systems, offer rapid and accurate information retrieval, their performance in specific domains is hindered by training on general domain datasets. Creating domain-specific training datasets, while effective, is time-consuming, expensive, and heavily reliant on domain experts. This thesis presents a comprehensive exploration of efficient technologies to address the challenge of information access in specific domains, focusing on retrieval-based systems encompassing question answering and ranking. \n \nWe begin with a comprehensive introduction to the information access system. We demonstrated the structure of a information access system through a typical open-domain question-answering task. We outline its two major components: retrieval and reader models, and the design choice for each part. We focus on mainly three points: 1) the design choice of the connection of the two components. 2) the trade-off associated with the retrieval model and the best frontier in practice. 3) a data augmentation method to adapt the reader model, trained initially on closed-domain datasets, to effectively answer questions in the retrieval-based setting. \n \nSubsequently, we discuss various methods enabling system adaptation to specific domains. Transfer learning techniques are presented, including generation as data augmentation, further pre-training, and progressive domain-clustered training. We also present a novel zero-shot re-ranking method inspired by the compression-based distance. We summarize the conclusions and findings gathered from the experiments. \n \nMoreover, the exploration extends to retrieval-based systems beyond textual corpora. We explored the search system for an e-commerce database, wherein natural language queries are combined with user preference data to facilitate the retrieval of relevant products. To address the challenges, including noisy labels and cold start problems, for the retrieval-based e-commerce ranking system, we enhanced model training through cascaded training and adversarial sample weighting. Another scenario we investigated is the search system in the math domain, characterized by the unique role of formulas and distinct features compared to textual searches. We tackle the math related search problem by combining neural ranking models with structual optimized algorithms. \n \nFinally, we summarize the research findings and future research directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→