Literárněkritická a překladatelská činnost Alberta Vyskočila
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The diploma thesis The Literary Critical and Translation Work of Albert Vyskočil focuses mainly on the two activities of Vyskočil mentioned in the title, his other work spanning many more fields. As for the literary critical work, the thesis addresses, first, the writers and poets he considers the best (Karel Hynek Mácha occupying the foremost place), and, second, the nature of his critiques. Vyskočil looks for genuineness in art, such art having its origin in God. By analyzing four translated texts and the source texts, the part concerning Vyskočil's translations aims at finding constant principles that guide his work. Apart from trying to adequately render the meaning and style of the original, Vyskočil aims at achieving naturalness of language, therefore, he uses substitution, on many levels; furthermore, he uses compensation, condensation and explicitation. At its end, the thesis comments on the interconnection between the two Vyskočil's activities, there being similarities of language and style, and also of themes and opinions expressed in both. Apart from the above mentioned the thesis states general biographical data and briefly introduces the author's other works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".