Lacrosse and its spread and transformation in various countries with emphasis on continental Europe
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
History of lacrosse itself has also received attention from scholars. Most of these works focus their examination on lacrosse within the United States and Canada. Fisher and Kennedy analyze the formation of the game in Great Britain and Ireland (Fisher 2002, Kennedy 2015). This text presents results of ethnographic research related to the ethnohistory of lacrosse (based on multi-sited ethnography) with an emphasis on various European countries mainly of so called Continental Europe (Czech Republic, Poland, Finland, Austria, Germany, Switzerland), Israel and Turkey. Media coverage of the game also played a crucial role in transformation of lacrosse with its spread around the world. Therefore, lacrosse as a subject of cultural exchanges, travels of the team Iroquois Nationals to the World Championships and role of the popular culture in a spread of lacrosse is discussed. To demonstrate these influences, I examine the trans-local networks and I use glocalization concept as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it