Letter to Robt. Hamilton from Thos. Gourlay, 19 January 1818
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Letter to Robt. Hamilton, Queenston, Upper Canada, from Thos. Gourlay, New York. It is \nstated that he has written several letters to Queenston but has not received a reply. He \nasked Robt. Corbet to forward to the New York Post Office any letters that arrived for \nhim after he left Canada, and to notify him of his brothers motions, but he has not done \nso. He asks that Hamilton inform him on the subject. He has heard the [preacher?] of \nNiagara has been thrown into goal and that Robert followed. He does not know the \ncause of their being apprehended or what will become of them. It is likely he will take a \npassage to one of the Islands and there wait for a vessel going to South America. He \npresently boards at 15 Front St., but asks that any mail be directed to the Post Office \nshould he move. Cooper [name missing] boards in the same house and is a Canadian, \nand is acquainted with most of the good folks in that quarter. He asks if Hamilton \nknows him, January 19, 1818. Postmarked New York Jan 19.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.416 | 0.183 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".