MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057689487

Los derechos adquiridos frente a la función administrativa

2013· article· es· W7057689487 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace Main Institutional Repository University of the North (Universidad del Norte) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrinciple of legalityHonestyPower (physics)Constitutional courtGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La protección a los derechos adquiridos constituye una garantía constitucional frente al ejercicio del poder unilateral de la autoridad administrativa; sin embargo, como todo derecho, se imponen límites resultado de la aplicación del principio de buena fe cuando el particular rompe la confianza legítima que sustenta el principio de presunción de legalidad de los actos administrativos y cuando por disposición legal entren en juego los altos intereses generales, como ocurre en materia ambiental. Abstract Protection of acquired rights constitutes a constitutional security before the practice of the unilateral power of the administrative authority. Nevertheless, as any right, limits are imposed as a result of applying the principle of honesty when the individual breaks the legitimate confidence supporting the principle of assumption of legality of administrative acts and when by legal disposition high general interests are involved as it occurs in the environmental matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it