MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057796480

The Life and Music of Canadian Jazz Clarinetist Phil Nimmons

2011· article· en· W7057796480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigiNole (Florida State University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJazzMainstreamJazz danceMusic educationPerformance art
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This treatise will focus on the life and music of Canadian jazz clarinetist Phil Nimmons. It will introduce Canadian and non-Canadian musicians to Phil Nimmons' accomplishments as a jazz performer, composer, and pedagogue. Phil Nimmons has been an active member of the Canadian music scene since the late 1930s. He has contributed to the evolution of the Canadian jazz scene, is recognized as being one of Canada's great composers, and a pedagogue who helped to develop jazz education in Canada. As a composer, Nimmons has written over 400 classical and jazz compositions for stage, television, radio, theater and film, in addition to hundreds of jazz orchestrations. As a performer, Nimmons has been credited for his significant contribution to the cultural life of Canada for being largely responsible for bringing jazz into the mainstream through radio performances, concerts, workshops and the classroom. As an educator, Nimmons was a founding member of the Advanced School of Contemporary Music (ASCM). He was the first Artistic Director of the jazz program at the Banff Centre for the Arts, and influential in the inauguration of the Jazz program at the University of Toronto, of which he is Director Emeritus and has taught at the Faculty of Music for over 30 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.138
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigiNole (Florida State University)Same topicMagnetic Field Sensors TechniquesFrench-language works237,207