La dimensión comunitaria de la religión : educación, tolerancia y nuetralidad del estado: un abordaje desde el caso Loyola Hight School v. Quebec (Attorney General)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: El propósito de este estudio es presentar, a partir de lo resuelto por la Suprema Corte de Canadá en el marco del caso mencionado, un desarrollo en torno al balance que realiza esa sede respecto del derecho a la libertad religiosa en su aspecto comunitario (y más precisamente, en el ámbito educativo) con dos valores que se encuentran en el centro del debate actual: la tolerancia y la neutralidad estatal. En efecto, a partir de la jurisprudencia (nacional e internacional) y de la doctrina citada por los magistrados, así como también desde la misma idiosincracia del pueblo canadiense, se analizarán cada uno de los conceptos antes mencionados, y la resolución adoptada por la Corte donde se enuncia que tolerancia y neutralidad estatal no implican negación de la dimensión religiosa de la persona humana, sino justamente, convivencia pacífica que lleve al desarrollo pleno del hombre. Finalmente, se extraerán conclusiones respecto de las consecuencias jurídicas que podrían derivarse del caso en lo relativo al desarrollo del la libertad religiosa en el ámbito educativo como derecho fundamental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".