La Moneda en el Área Rural de Ebusus (siglos IV-I a.C.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El estudio y catalogación de la colección de monedas donadas por A. Martín al MAEF en 1991, procedente de hallazgos esporádicos en un medio rural ibicenco, ha permitido conocer mejor cómo estaba formada la masa monetaria en Ebusus entre los siglos V-IV y el I a.C. Durante este período la producción monetaria de Ebusus cubrió, casi en su totalidad, las necesidades monetarias de bronce de la isla. La nueva muestra también ratifica los niveles de producción en cada uno de los diversos períodos en los que se agrupa, así como la inexistencia de diferencias entre la moneda de bronce utilizada en un entorno urbano y de necrópolis y la que se empleó en ámbitos rurales y periurbanos. Por su tamaño y peso fue una moneda inapropiada para cubrir pagos de considerable cuantía, dado su reducido valor, pero pone de manifiesto la intensa y temprana monetización de Ebusus ya desde el pleno siglo III a.C. The study of the collection of coins presented by A. Martin to the MAEF, in 1991, coming from sporadic findings in rural areas of ibiza, has allowed us to improve our knowledge about the coinages circulating in Ebusus, between the 5th/4th centuries BC and the 1st BC. During this period the monetary output of Ebusus covered, almost in its totality the bronze monetary needs of the island. The new collection also ratifies the levels of production in every period in which coins are grouped. The sample also attested the nonexistence of differences between the bronze coins used in an urban media and in necropolis and those that were used in rural and periurban context. By its size and weight it was an unsuitable coinage to cover payments with considerable quantity, due to his reduced value, but they show the intense and early monetization of Ebusus, already from early 3rd century BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".