MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7058024046

Molecular Regulation of a Novel Pro-Survival Bnip3 Spliced Variant NIPLET in Cardiac Myocytes Functionally Couples ER and Mitochondria.

2015· dissertation· en· W7058024046 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumMitochondrial permeability transition poreMitochondrionUnfolded protein responseGene isoformAlternative splicingRNA splicingProgrammed cell deathER retention
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alternative splicing provides a versatile mechanism by which cells can generate proteins with different or even antagonistic properties. Herein we describe a novel splice variant of the hypoxia-inducible death gene Bnip3. Sequence analysis of the new Bnip3 protein revealed an N-terminus that was identical to Bnip3 but contained an Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention motif within the C-terminus, therefore we designated the new Bnip3 isoform NIPLET for (Nip-Like ER Target). While Bnip3 was predominately localized to mitochondria and promoted mitochondrial perturbations and cell death, NIPLET was preferentially localized to the ER and opposed the cytotoxic actions of Bnip3. Interestingly, NIPLET suppressed mitochondrial injury from Bnip3 activation and mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening by a mechanism dependent upon the dynamin motor protein Mitofusin-2 (MFN2). Notably, mutations of NIPLET within the critical ER retention motif rendered NIPLET defective for interacting with MFN2 and suppressed necrosis induced by Bnip3 or hypoxia. Hence, our findings reveal a novel signaling pathway that functionally couples ER and mitochondria for cell survival to a mechanism that is mutually dependent and obligatorily linked to a novel BNIP3 protein in cardiac myocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→