MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7058032630

Light-Fueled Liquid Crystal Networks for Aquatic Soft Robotics

2023· dissertation· en· W7058032630 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoft roboticsRoboticsDecoupling (probability)RobotField (mathematics)TorqueControl system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field of soft robotics has developed in response to the need for mechanisms that can operate safely in interaction with humans. Within the field of soft robotics, there is a growing demand for the development of small-scale soft devices capable of non-invasive medical interventions in a variety of technologies, including medical microrobotics, biosensing, and biomedical engineering. Among the many materials used for small-scale soft robotics, liquid crystal networks (LCNs) are of particular interest. LCNs are molecularly anisotropic and demonstrate reversible, programmable shape change upon exposure to external stimuli such as light or heat. However, the actuation of LCNs is often triggered by light, either photochemically or photothermally, which is typically less efficient when operating in flooded environments. Actuation in confined and flooded environments is an important challenge that must be overcome for the implementation of LCNs in real-world biomedical applications. Decoupling the mechanisms of powering, locomotion, and control from robotic functions is a strong solution for achieving efficient operation in flooded media. This work showcases two examples of decoupling locomotion and robotic function for the efficient use of small-scale devices at the air-water interface. This is done through the use of LCNs for control in conjunction with protein motors for powering. An LCN that responds to visible light, rather than UV, is also fabricated and characterized, and will be used for underwater robotic applications in future studies. \nIn the first case study, protein motors and LCNs are used to power and control a multi-component mechanical device. A milli-scale gear train with integrated motor and clutch functionalities is fabricated and operated at the air-water interface. The driving gear has a protein motor coating and generates propulsive force using the Marangoni effect. This force is transmitted through the gear train unless the clutch gear is activated. The clutch gear is fabricated from a photothermally responsive LCN that has been plasticized through the addition of a nematogenic solvent to improve actuation efficiency. The teeth of the clutch gear bend downwards to disengage from the gear train upon exposure to light, halting the chain of motion on demand. The second case study utilizes photochemical LCNs with applied protein motor coating to construct a V-shaped swimmer that moves across the surface of the water. Photochemical LCNs are used for their meta-stable state that allows for deformations to be held without constant exposure to stimuli. The protein motors are integrated directly onto the LCN swimmer for a single device with orthogonal mechanisms for powering and control. The protein motors generate force that propels the swimmer forward while deformation of the LCN is used for directional control. \nIn both case studies, UV light is required for shape-change. Looking forward to biomedical applications, a photochemical LCN that is responsive to visible light is also developed and characterized in both air and water. The design of LCN-based small-scale devices with a focus on safe and efficient operation in wet environments will open up new and exciting applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→