Leyendas monetales, iconografía y legitimación en el califato ḥammūdí. Las emisiones de 'Alī b. Ḥammūd del año 408/1017-1018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article analyzes the coins issued by 'Alī b. Ḥammūd, the first caliph of the Ḥammūdi dynasty in al-Andalus, in the year 408/1017-1018. Special attention has been given to the analysis of monetary legends and their relation with different aspects of legitimation of the dynasty. The images of fish depicted in one of the series of coins has been studied and a number of hypotheses have been suggested, to provide a deeper knowledge of Ḥammūdi numismatic. Finally, the article includes a catalogue of the coins decorated with fish figures from that year. En el presente artículo se analizan las emisiones del año 408/1017-1018 que llevara a cabo 'Alī b. Ḥammūd, primer califa de la dinastía ḥammūdí en al-Andalus. Se ha prestado especial atención al análisis de las leyendas monetales y a su relación con diversos aspectos relativos a la legitimidad de dicha dinastía. Asimismo, se ha estudiado la presencia del motivo figurativo del pez en una de las series de este año y se ha sugerido una serie de hipótesis interpretativas y líneas de investigación que puedan llevamos a un mejor conocimiento de la numismática ḥammūdí. Para finalizar, se incluye el catálogo de los ejemplares con peces del año 408/1017-1018.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".