MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7058101073

MBL Monthly, vol. 11, no. 4, April 2002

2012· article· en· W7058101073 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUniversity of California, San FranciscoSchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthBilkent ÜniversitesiUniversity of South DakotaTemple UniversityUniversity of South FloridaUniversity of South CarolinaEast Carolina UniversityAmes Research CenterDartmouth CollegeU.S. National Library of MedicineAndrew W. Mellon FoundationUniversity of PittsburghVirginia Commonwealth UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyBrown UniversityTulane UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of MiamiNorthwestern UniversityRIKENChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaHelsingin YliopistoNational Science FoundationCase Western Reserve UniversityIndian Institute of ScienceEmory UniversityUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIKaiser PermanenteOhio State UniversityUniversidad de Buenos AiresWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionYale UniversityU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolAstraZenecaOffice of Naval ResearchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillU.S. Department of AgricultureUniversity of PennsylvaniaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsIdentification (biology)ImmunogeneticsStrain (injury)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3810.396

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207