MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7058105101

Max Ernst; novelas collage

2015· dissertation· es· W7058105101 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScientia Insularum Revista de Ciencias Naturales en islas · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResearch methodologyPhotographyQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La intención de este trabajo es profundizar en la concepción del collage a través de la obra de Max Ernst –principalmente mediante el estudio de sus tres novelas collage: La femme 100 têtes; Rêve d’une petite fille qui voulut entrer au Carmel; Une semaine de bonté ou les sept éléments capitaux–, contextualizándola históricamente, estableciendo paralelismos, buscando posibles referentes… Intentaremos, además, responder a diferentes cuestiones (¿en qué consiste el collage?, ¿cuándo surgió?, ¿cuáles han sido sus principales exponentes?, ¿qué lugar ocupa el collage en la obra de Max Ernst?, etc.) a medida que desarrolle el tema con el fin de establecer un marco teórico que me permita analizar las novelas collage de Max Ernst partiendo de una base adecuada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientia Insularum Revista de Ciencias Naturales en islasSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207