L’Entente Québec-France et ses limites : le cas des médecins de famille
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Officiellement, l’Entente entre le Québec et la France en matière de reconnaissance mutuelle des qualifications professionnelles avait pour principal objectif de faciliter la mobilité de la main-d’œuvre qualifiée entre le Québec et la France. Nous avons essayé d’en apprécier l’impact pour une profession particulière : médecin spécialiste en médecine de famille. Nous constatons que l’Entente, étant donné l’objectif de facilitation de la mobilité, a eu une portée somme toute limitée. Cette limitation tient surtout au fait que l’Entente soit subordonnée aux dispositions législatives, règlementaires et administratives internes à chacune des Parties, soit la France et le Québec. C’est donc dire que les principales limites se situent non pas au niveau des relations internationales mais au niveau national.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".