Műszaki szabályozási érdekességek az Európai Unió és az Egyesült Királyság megállapodásából = Technical Regulatory Issues from the Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Brexit-folyamat legvégső pillanatában, egy az EU–Kanada szabadkereskedelmi egyezmény (CETA) mintájára létrehozott és 2020. december 30-án aláírt kereskedelmi és együttműködési megállapodással sikerült a liberalizált árumozgás megtartása az aláíró felek között. Az európai belső piacon szabadon forgalmazható, összes árura vonatkozó EU-s műszaki jogszabályok továbbra is kötelezők az EK exporttermékeire az Európai Gazdasági Térség (EGT) 31 országában, de most már nem feltételek nélkül érvényesek az EK-ban, mint arra az átmeneti időszakra vonatkozóan kötelezettséget vállaltak, hanem csak a megállapodásban rögzített módon, amire érdemes felhívni mind a jogalkotók, mind a bilaterális kereskedelemben részt vevő felek szíves figyelmét, és megemlíteni egy ezzel összefüggő gazdaságpolitikai kérdést. = At the very last moment of the Brexit process, a trade and cooperation agreement modeled on the EU–Canada Free Trade Agreement (CETA) and signed on 30 December 2020 succeeded in maintaining the liberalised movement of goods between the signatories. The EU technical regulation for all goods that can be freely traded on the European internal market remains binding on U.K. exports to the EEA-31, but is no longer unconditionally in force in the U.K. as was commited for a transitional period; but only in the way set out in the Agreement, to which it is worth drawing the kind attention of both legislators and parties involved in bilateral trade while mentioning a related economic policy issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".