MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7058192420

Monoamines and the modulatory control of spinal sensory processing

2000· other· en· W7058192420 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoamine neurotransmitterNeurotransmissionLong-term potentiationNeurotransmitterAgonistSpinal cordSerotoninDopamineSensory system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The descending monoamines serotonin (5-HT), noradrenaline (NA) and dopamine (DA), and acetylcholine (ACh), a spinal monoamine, have been previously shown to exert modulatory control over spinal functions, including nociception. Partly due to the multiple receptor subtypes these transmitters bind to, the mechanisms underlying their actions are not clearly understood. In three interrelated studies, whole-cell patch clamp recordings in a spinal cord slice preparation were conducted to investigate the manner in which the monoamines modify both synaptic responses and cellular properties of deep dorsal horn (DDH) neurons of the neonatal rat. First, the actions of all four transmitters on individual DDH neurons were compared. The results demonstrated that 5-HT, NA and DA similarly depressed synaptic responses, while ACh produced facilitation in most neurons. Though none of these transmitters altered the passive membrane properties of the neurons, they converted neurons with phasic firing properties, in response todepolarizing current steps, to repetitive. Secondly, the actions of several selective S-HT receptor ligands on synaptic responses evoked in two age groups of animals (P3-6, P10-14) were compared. In both age groups, the 5-HT1A receptor agonist produced synaptic depression in most neurons, while the 5-HT3 and 7 receptor agonists produced synaptic facilitation. Additionally, selective antagonism of the 5-HT1A receptor generally facilitated evoked responses, suggesting that sensory transmission to the DDH is tonically inhibited by endogenous 5-HT. Thirdly, since long-term potentiation (LTP) of primary afferent synapses in spinal neurons may represent 'memory modules' that produce long-lasting increases in sensory gain, we studied 5-HT's control over the induction and expression of sensory-evoked synaptic plasticity. 5-HT was tested on evoked synaptic responses before, duri g or after a conditioning stimulation (CS) that produced either UP or long-term depression (LTD). Overall, 5-HT depressed the evoked responses, before or after CS-induced UP and LTD. Importantly, CS in the presence of 5-HT significantly increased the incidence of LTD. These studies suggest that the three descending monoaminergic transmitter systems are organized to exert similar modulatory control over spinal sensory functions. Furthermore, although various mechanisms might be involved, their general action at the cellular level of the spinal cord dorsal horn is depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→