Multivariate Associations between White Matter and the Cognitions in Schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deficits in “the cognitions” are important contributors to functional outcomes in schizophrenia. An unanswered question of considerable import is if neurocognitive and social cognitive deficits arise from overlapping or distinct white matter impairments. By applying dimensional multivariate statistical analyses to the Social Processes Initiative in the Neurobiology of the Schizophrenia(s) (SPINS) dataset, the present thesis establishes that white matter circuitry is related to both neurocognition and social cognition. In particular, the uncinate fasciculus and the rostral body of the corpus callosum may assume a “privileged role” subserving both. Further, we found that participant-wise estimates of white matter microstructure, weighted by cognitive performance, do not reveal novel biotypes, but are largely consistent with participants’ categorical diagnosis, and predictive of functional outcome. In tandem, our results underscore the promise of white matter and cognitive assessment to identify biomarkers of functioning, with potential prognostic and therapeutic relevance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".