199 News, Vol. 21 No. 10, December 1986
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An issue of 199 News for December 1986. This issue includes: Plant Gates Revisited, Season's Greetings From Your Local 199 Executive, Notice to Current Retired Workers, Job Worries Bring Workers To Unions, Losing More Than Jobs!, Letters, $10,000 - Thank You 199!, Employee Counsellor Corner, Financial Secretary Treasurer, Women's Committee, Union Counsellor Course, Retirees, Forge Report, Human Rights Violated, Apprentice Report, Community and Social Services, Feds Guilty of Risking Health, UIC Waiting Period, QWL: A Critical Analysis, Big Six Drive Pays Off, The NDP and Prime Time TV, 50th Anniversary, 50 Years of Service to Its Members and Community, A Real Champion, Who Refuses Unsafe Work?, Environment Committee, Substance Abuse, First CAW Conference, Low Interest Rate Blues, Retirees Chapter, Locals Raise Over $66,000, Pushing Brain-Candy For Profit, Labour Canada Examines Children's Career Choices, Drug Testing As A condition of Employment Is An Insult To The Innocent And An Immoral Attack On The Victims, WCB Claims: How Your Doctor Can Help.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.368 | 0.393 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".