Mexican protected horticulture: Production and market of Mexican protected horticulture described and analysed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study describes and analyses the strongly developing Mexican greenhouse horticultural sector, which is a relevant partner for the Dutch supply industry. The sector is geographically spread over the large country, and characterized by widevariation in technology level. The export to the USA and Canada is relevant for the development of the vegetable sector.Timing of production, logistics, quality and traceability, cost reduction and cooperation are essential. The ornamental sector can not compete with other Latin American countries on the export market, and will largely depend on the domesticsituation. Hardware, knowledge, infrastructure, cooperation are some of the issues. The Dutch horticultural industry is world-leading and supplies high-quality products and services. Therefore, the obvious markets for Dutch suppliers in Mexico are formed by the medium and high-tech sectors. Most interesting are:1. Small to medium scale (0.5 to 2 ha) vegetable farms that have formed clusters.2. Small to medium scale flower and ornamental farms that need good varieties.3. Medium to large vegetable growers in various regions can be assisted in their advancement through a tailormade approach.4. Medium to large-scale cut flower farms in Baja California that exporting to the USA.5. Agroparks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".