MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7058553765

The mechanism of Ivermectin-induced cytotoxicity in C. elegans /

2004· dissertation· en· W7058553765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVacuoleIvermectinCytotoxicityMutantEndocytosisMutationMechanism (biology)Phenotype
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The anti-nematodal drug ivermectin hyperactivates invertebrate-specific glutamate-gated chloride channels (GluCls) causing pharyngeal paralysis and a cessation of feeding and growth. I find that for C. elegans even brief exposure to ivermectin can lead to irreversible pharyngeal paralysis. Ivermectin induces heterogeneous vacuolation in the pharynx that appears slowly and accumulates over several days. This vacuolation is almost completely rescued by a mutation in avr-15, which codes for the alpha-subunit of pharyngeal GluCls. The vacuoles stain strongly with Lysotracker Red and are therefore likely to be acidic compartments of the endosomal-lysosomal system. Examination of mutants defective for endocytosis (rme-1, rme-8, and cup-5) uncovers the presence of acidic vacuoles identical in appearance to ivermectin-induced vacuoles. Further, RME-1, a marker for recycling endosomes, is shown to redistribute soon after ivermectin exposure. Examination of the effects of ivermectin on extrapharyngeal neurons expressing ectopic avr-15 reveals an apoptotic phenotype that is shown to be ced-independent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→