MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7058555742

Normas para teses e dissertações

2021· other· pt· W7058555742 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) · 2021
Typeother
Languagept
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este guia tem como objetivo orientar os pós-graduandos na elaboração de suas dissertações e teses. Pretende também, contribuir para a padronização dos trabalhos produzidos na Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Campus São Paulo \n(Escola Paulista de Medicina e Escola Paulista de Enfermagem). Neste manual, é abordado os princípios para a elaboração de dissertações e teses, tais como: compreender e utilizar os Requisitos Uniformes, conhecido como Normas de Vancouver, elaboração de referências bibliográficas e regras gerais para \nnormalização da estrutura física.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.129
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.344
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1290.344
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.016
Science and technology studies0.0080.022
Scholarly communication0.0220.016
Open science0.0040.011
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207