MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7059599167

[no title]

2021· other· fr· W7059599167 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDirectory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) · 2021
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationIdentity (music)Subject (documents)Ecological succession
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendant près de deux siècles après le Traité d'Utrecht, de 1713 à 1904, la France envoya ses flottes de pêche à Terre-Neuve. Dès 1854, cette présence saisonnière fut encadrée par une représentation consulaire française sur l'île, une succession de consuls, vice-consuls et agents consulaires dont l'avant dernier était Charles Riballier des Isles. Les correspondances de Riballier des Isles, éditées par Ronald Rompkey, constituent un complément de sources précieux pour la connaissance des relations tendues entre la France et l'Angleterre à Terre-Neuve. D'autre part, elles nous renseignent sur l'organisation de la pêche et les relations entre les saisonniers français et la population locale. Elles représentent aussi une source précieuse pour connaître la vie quotidienne à Terre-Neuve dans la seconde moitié du xixe siècle et les activités et responsabilités de la fonction consulaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0110.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4690.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it