Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The work presents the results of two preventive excavations undertaken prior to the extension and reorganisation of the Palais de Justice at Épinal (Vosges), carried out in the late 1990s. These archaeological investigations covered a surface area of 3 000 m2, and were correlated with other documentary sources to provide new information on the origins of the town and the development of a quarter located at the heart of the urban space, between the château and the basilica of Saint-Maurice. The oldest traces of occupation of the sector date to the 8th-9th century, but it is only from the 10th century that the first redevelopments are attested, on the edges of a wet area on the site of a former watercourse. The space became gradually more structured between the 13th and early 17th centuries with the development of habitations opening onto rear courtyards and connected with artisanal and commercial activities. In the 1620s, the built environment was taken over by the Congrégation Notre-Dame. This religious order constructed a new convent in the 18th century. Following the Revolution, the religious buildings were employed for administrative functions before the construction in around 1820 of a prison, destroyed in the late 20th century. In addition to the information relating to the origins and transformation of the urban space, this publication offers an illuminating insight into the material and spiritual life of a district over a period of nearly a millennium. Finally, it provides an original view of the daily life of a religious community in the Modern period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.806 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it