Bibliographic record
Abstract
If critics are to be believed, the use of video on the theatrical stage had become \nsomething of a fad by the early years of the new millennium. "Multimedia," \nwrote Lyn Gardner in the Guardian, "is a word I've come to dread in the theatre. \nThere was a period around five years ago when you could hardly step inside a \ntheatre to see a new play without encountering a bank of video monitors." \nDiedrich Diederichsen recounts the similarly exasperated tone of a Berlin critic, \nwho wrote in December 2003 of her wish for the coming year that the Berlin \nVolksbuhne might resist using video projections just once. Opera, meanwhile, \nhas been no stranger to this fascination with video. Toronto critic Peter Goddard \nrecently wrote of "opera's video projection fetish," quoting director Astrid Janson \non the "fashionable" use of "large projections, particularly in Wagner."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".