MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7060123259

オゾン層保護法の制定過程に関する考察

2017· other· en· W7060123259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNagasaki University's Academic Output SITE (Nagasaki University) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal ProtocolOzone layerConventionRationalization (economics)ChlorofluorocarbonOzone depletion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stratospheric ozone depletion caused by emission of chemicals including chlorofluorocarbon (CFCs) is one of the global environmental problems. Vienna Convention adopted in 1985 and Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Montreal pact) adopted in 1987 oblige participant nations to regulate production of chemicals including CFCs (ozone-depleting substance) in order for all nations to cooperate in protecting the ozone layer. Japan has enacted Law Concerning the Protection of the Ozone Layer and launched measures to suppress emission of ozone-depleting substance, rationalization of its usage, and regulate its production based on the law. Additionally, Japan has adopted Vienna Convention and Montreal pact. This paper intends to analyze the policymaking process leading to the enactment of Law Concerning the\nProtection of the Ozone Layer. Additionally, because it is pointed out that Chemical Substances Control Law enacted in 1973 has influenced on discussion on Law Concerning the Protection of the Ozone Layer, authors try to analyze the significance of Chemical Substances Control Law in Japanese environmental policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNagasaki University's Academic Output SITE (Nagasaki University)Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207