MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7060312720

ALAT PENGEBOR PCB

2009· dissertation· id· W7060312720 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUnika Repositor (Unika) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFire investigationSingle stage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perkembangan dunia elektronika saat ini sangat cepat berkembang. Dimana hampir setiap bagian dan aspek dimasyarakat menggunakan perangkat elektronika. Salah satu proses dalam pembuatan perangkat elektronika adalah proses pengeboran. Alat pengebor ini didesain untuk mengebor titik pada PCB dengan koordinat- koordinat yang telah ditentukan sebelumnya. Desain yang digunakan alat ini menggunakan menggunakan PC(Personal Computer) sebagai pengendali, paralel port/ LPT1 sebagai antarmuka(interface), PPI 8255 sebagai multiplexing, driver motor stepper, dan alat pengebor sebagai pelaksana perintah

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it