Bibliographic record
Abstract
4. I Corr espoudence.2•5 registering fifteen to twenty-four degrees below zero with a frequency and persistency that is quite unusual in this vicinity.On stormy days the birds were not seen about the city, but they seemed quite indifferent to the cold, 'and when the sun was shining, even though the temperatnre was extremely low, they literally swarmed upon the branches, and on the g.round beneath the mountain ash trees, in the squares and gardens; nor did they finally leave until every berry had been devoured.I bad almost neglected to note another occurrence for which the past winter will remain remarkable--the advent of Passer domesticus.Somewhere about New-Year's day a stnall detachment of English Sparrows--the first that are known to have visited this Province--arrived at St. John in a car of grain shipped from some western city; and, somewhat in the style of other 'cheeky' visitors, these pests act as if they intended to 'stay all summer.'--Mo•w^ou•C•A•a•RL^X•, St'.•o•n, N. B. Second Addendum to List of Birds Ascertained to Occur within ten miles from Point de Monts, Province of Quebec, Canada; based chiefly upon the Notes of Napoleon A. Comeau.--Mr.Corneau has sent me skins of the following-named species, taken by hitn at Godbout, and not previously recorded frotn that locality: i$7.Saxicola cenanthe.Shot May •8, •884.•58.Passerella iliaca.Shot Oct. •, •883.i59.Spizella monticola.Shot in August, •883.•6o.Passer domesticus.Shot May 27, t884.•6t.Empidonax flaviventris.Shot in Angust or September, •883.t62.Tringa canutus.Shot in August or September, •883.•63.Accipiter fuscus.Shot May 2, I884.Tolerably common; breeds.i64.Melospiza lincolni.Shot June 2, •884.•65.Melospiza palustris.Shot June 2, I884.t66.Falco peregrinus n•evius.Shot June •,, I884.•67.Passerina cyanea.Shot June 8, •884.•68.Siurus auricapillus.Shot
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.389 | 0.210 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".