Observations of Length at Maturity in Yellowtail Flounder \non the Grand Bank (1995-97)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Length and age at maturity are essential information to determine the spawning stock biomass \nand stock-recruit relationship. The usual knife-edge estimates of the mature proportions in fish \npopulations obscure the knowledge on the true levels of the spawning potential of the stocks and the \ntemporal variability is ignored. \nThe yellowtail flounder stock is mainly concentrated on the southern Grand Bank, where the \njuvenile and the adult components overlap in their distribution. There was a fishing moratoria for this \nstock from 1994 to 1997, and for 1998 the Scientific Council recommended reopening a limited fishery, \nstating also that this fishery should be carefully monitored and sampled. \nMorgan and Walsh (1977) presented estimates of length and age at maturity for yellowtail \nflounder in Divisions 3 LNO from 1975 to 1995, based on the Canadian spring survey. In this paper \nadditional information on this subject is presented, based on the results of the of the Spanish spring \nsurvey in Divisions 3NO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".