Optimisation des planifications chirurgicales de la scoliose idiopathique adolescente
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anatomie descriptive et fonctionnelle du rachis sain -- La scoliose idiopathique adolescente (SIA) -- Le traitement par instrumentation chirurgicale postérieure -- Évolution de l'instrumentation chirurgicale postérieure -- Biomécanique du traitement par instrumentation chirurgicale postérieure -- Simulations numériques du traitement par instrumentation chirurgicale -- Revue des travaux antérieurs de notre équipe -- Sommaire de l'état actuel des connaissances -- Hypothèses, objectifs et cadre méthodologique -- Étude de la variabilité des objectifs de correction du rachis scoliotique -- Scoliosis correction objectives in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis -- Optimisation des planifications chirurgicales de la scoliose -- Computer simulation for optimization of instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis -- Étude prospective de l'optimisation de la chirurgie d'instrumentation sur un deuxième cas -- Effets de la variabilité des objectifs de correction sur des stratégies d'instrumentation du rachis scoliotique -- The repercussion of correction objectives on instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".