Path Dependence, Multiple Equilibria, and Adaptive Efficiency in Forest Regimes in India
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"The evolution of forest regimes in India has almost completed a full cycle from the community regime in the pre-British period through state regimes during the British colonial period and the first post-independence phase and finally back to community based regimes in the 1990s. During the British period that evolution may be characterized as discontinuous, in the standard (temporal) sense, but path-dependent in a geographical sense. Change resulted from the imposition of a new organizational structure with enough energy to dismantle the existing structure; its geographical path-dependency reflected the inertia of the British organizational structure developed in other countries. Regimes changes in the post-British period have been path-dependent (in the temporal sense) due to self-reinforcing mechanisms,among which organizational inertia has been the dominant one. fa the post 1987 phase,external factors(outside the government and the forest department), such as non-governmental organizations and peoples initiatives at the local level have moved the process closer to one of adaptive efficiency. However, multiple forest regimes have been present at all times. An argument is made for development of a theory of evolution of resource regimes that incorporates interactions between formal institutions and the informal institutions of user groups of the state's forestry administration."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it