Performing Blackness/Archiving Whiteness: The Y Minstrels, 1927-1951
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The province of Québec is often not included or under-studied in research regarding blackface minstrelsy, but it would be fallacious to assume that its underrepresentation in publicly accessible archives equates its non-existence. Blackface minstrelsy is a racist theatrical form in which white actors and musicians, the minstrels, would apply burnt cork to their faces and perform derogatory stereotypes of Black people in front of white audiences. As Cheryl Thompson argues, white Canadians reproduced American minstrelsy, not to soothe class fears, but in response to their fears about Black immigration and their supposed inability to assimilate into Canadian culture. Looking specifically at Montréal, blackness was used as a satirical tool to debase francophone bodies, which were deemed “other” to the Anglo-Saxon English-speaking majority at the time. Henri Julien’s Songs of the By-Town Coons exemplifies how blackface minstrelsy imagery found its way into mainstream media and the width of its popularity. Located in the Jewish Public Library archives, the Young Men/Women Hebrew Association (YM-YWHA) and the Irving Silverman fonds contain a plethora of photographs and documents related to their very own minstrels, which were part of their musical programme. Examining the YMHA minstrels as a case study allows for the first in-depth analysis of this troupe and for situating it within the broader context of Canadian blackface minstrelsy. This project then observes the role of the performances and their recording in the Jewish community’s own archives as a necessity for self-representation while simultaneously highlighting the pride they took in their performances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".