Quarter Life Crisis Dalam Fotografi Ekspresi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skripsi penciptaan karya fotografi seni ini mengangkat keadaan jiwa pada masa remaja akhir dan dewasa awal dengan rentang usia 18-25 tahun yang merasakan kekhawatiran dan keraguan yang berlebih. Fotografi ekspresi dipilih karena menjadi salah satu genre yang mampu menyampaikan pesan tentang gejolak jiwa atau suasana hati. Pengumpulan data untuk skripsi ini dilakukan melalui metode observasi, membaca literatur, melakukan wawancara dan menyebar kuesioner. Data yang terkumpul dijadikan sebagai landasan perwujudan ide dalam penciptaan karya. Penciptaan karya fotografi ekspresi ini bertujuan untuk memvisualkan dampak-dampak yang dirasakan dari fase quarter life crisis melalui penggunaan gesture dan simbol untuk memvisualkan konsep dan penerapan teknik fotografi hitam putih. Skripsi penciptaan karya fotografi ini menghasilkan karya imaji fotografi ekspresi tentang kekhawatiran dan keraguan remaja akhir pada fase quarter life crisis dengan penerapan teknik fotografi hitam putih.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".