MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061322778

Predicció de coeficients de pressió mitjançant xarxes neuronals artificials

2010· article· ca· W7061322778 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadUniversitat Rovira i VirgiliGeneralitat de CatalunyaDepartament d'Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la InformacióCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPretextElectrodiagnosisMedical screening
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S'ha realitzat un model d'interpolació, basat en xarxes neuronals artificials, d'una base de dades que conté informació de perfils de pressió sobre teulades d'edificacions de baixa alçada. Aquest model és capaç d'estimar, de forma precisa, quina serà la distribució de les pressions sobre una teulada amb les característiques físiques desitjades, depenent de la direcció incident del vent. Aquesta informació permet calcular quines seran les càrregues aerodinàmiques que haurà de suportar la teulada i per tant, millorar-ne el disseny sense tenir que recórrer a l'experimentació amb models a escala en túnels de vent. A més, durant el desenvolupament de la metodologia de treball, s'ha demostrat que les dades de pressió són suficients per a capturar prou informació de la dinàmica, d'un flux turbulent, per a realitzar models de predicció basats, únicament, amb dades històriques de pressions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207