MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061361071

Préserver lâillisible : présences de Sholem Shtern dans la vie littéraire canadienne

2009· article· en· W7061361071 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Subject (documents)Government (linguistics)Work (physics)Perspective (graphical)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughout the twentieth century, Canada was a land of refuge for a large number of immigrants from the four corners of the world. Once they had settled in this country and formed cultural communities, these newcomers often generated important literary and artistic trends in their own languages, and these movements reflected both concern with the survival of their identity and adaptation to new Canadian circumstances. The artistic journey of artists who hailed from these communities has gained greater significance today, as we have come to realize that their work informs us on the openness of Canadians to diversity. However, this body of work is either captured in many different languages – and quite often, not in either official language – or it makes use of lesser known artistic media. For these reasons, this corpus often eludes the large institutions mandated to constitute and to preserve Canadian archives. This text examines the case of Yiddish writer Sholem Shtern, who emigrated from Poland in 1927 at the age of twenty, and who published many collections of poetry and essays in Canada, in the Yiddish language. Shtern campaigned vigorously in Montreal and elsewhere in North America to include Yiddish writing in the life of his community, and by so doing, to promote a certain ideal of social justice. The personal archives of the author, which were deposited at the National Library of Canada (now Library and Archives Canada) shortly after his death in 1991, raise all kinds of questions relating to the preservation of the immigrant memory and to the literary lives of cultural communities who do not express themselves in either official language. RÉSUMÉ Le Canada a été tout au long du XXe siècle, une terre d’accueil pour un grand nombre d’immigrants venant des quatre coins du globe. Une fois installés au pays et regroupés en communautés culturelles, ces nouveaux arrivants ont souvent donné naissance, dans leur langue patrimoniale, à des courants littéraires ou artistiques importants qui reflétaient à la fois des préoccupations de survie identitaire et d’adaptation aux nouvelles circonstances canadiennes. Le cheminement des créateurs issus de ces communautés prend aujourd’hui une grande valeur du fait qu’il nous renseigne sur l’ouverture des Canadiens à la diversité. Or ce corpus disponible dans plusieurs langues, la plupart du temps nonofficielles, ou via des médias artistiques peu usités, échappe la plupart du temps aux grandes institutions chargées de constituer et de préserver les archives canadiennes. Ce texte explore le cas de l’écrivain yiddish Sholem Shtern, immigré de Pologne en 1927 à l’âge de vingt ans et qui a publié au Canada plusieurs recueils de poésie et des essais en langue yiddish. Shtern a milité très fortement à Montréal et ailleurs en Amérique pour inscrire l’écriture yiddish dans la vie de sa communauté et pour promouvoir du même coup un certain idéal de justice sociale. Déposées à la Bibliothèque nationale du Canada (aujourd’hui Bibliothèque et Archives Canada) peu après sa mort en 1991, les archives personnelles de l’auteur soulèvent toutes sortes de questions relatives à la préservation de la mémoire immigrante et à la vie littéraire des communautés culturelles de langue non-officielles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2650.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207