MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061374214

Predicting fatal drug poisoning (overdose) among people living with HIV-HCV co-infection

2025· dissertation· en· W7061374214 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityGilead SciencesViiV HealthcareStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsDrugPoison controlDiseaseMEDLINEEpidemiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Drug poisoning (overdose) is an important public health crisis, particularly among people living with HIV and hepatitis C (HIV-HCV) co-infection.Direct-acting antivirals result in high HCV cure rates, successfully reducing liver-related mortality.However, increased rates of drug poisoning deaths will negate these benefits.Investigating the potential predictors for drug poisoning could help to reduce mortality by identifying groups most at-risk.Objective: The objective of this thesis was to predict six-month drug poisoning mortality among people with HIV-HCV coinfection using socioeconomic, behavioural, and clinical factors, including factors that are routinely measured in clinical practice, as well as those recorded for research purposes.Methods: Data from the Canadian Co-infection Cohort (CCC) were used.Participants were followed up at six-month intervals when they completed questionnaires on socio-demographic, behavioural and clinical factors.Participants were eligible for analysis if they ever reported injection or non-injection drug use between 2003 and 2023.The outcome was death due to drug poisoning within six months of a participant's cohort visit.We selected a total of 40 predictors.We used a supervised machine learning model, random forest, to develop a classification algorithm.Due to imbalanced data, we used a stratified random forest approach with undersampling.Predictors of drug poisoning were ranked in order of importance and odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression with the top five important predictors.Four sensitivity analyses were conducted.Results: Of 2,132 total CCC participants, 1,998 met the eligibility criteria for this analysis.Of those eligible, 1,764 (88.3%) reported ever using injection drugs and 1,807 (90.4%) reported LIST OF ABBREVIATIONSHIV: Human immunodeficiency virus AIDS: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome ART: Antiretroviral therapy STBBI: Sexually transmitted blood borne infections PWID: People who inject drugs HCV: Hepatitis C virus DAA: Direct-acting antiviral CCC: Canadian Co-infection Cohort gbMSM: Gay, bisexual, and other men-who-have-sex-with-men PWUD: People who use drugs POC: Point-of-care MSM: Men who have sex with men U=U: Undetectable = Untransmissible PrEP: Pre-exposure prophylaxis PEP: Post-exposure prophylaxis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207