MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061381027

Profiling Osteogenic microRNAs For RNAi-Functionalization Of Scaffolds In Bone Tissue Engineering

2015· article· en· W7061381027 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsiNano Medical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNAMesenchymal stem cellGene expressionBone tissueBone remodelingGene expression profilingOsteoblast
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone remodeling and bone repair are natural processes occurring in the body throughout life. This metabolic process ensures that microfractures and microinjuries are repaired and thus maintaining healthy bones. However, when the damage is too large, such as from trauma injury or bone tumors, repair is limited and grafts are required to assist in bone repair. The use of allografts can cause immunological complications, whilst autografts subject the patient to two surgeries. Bone tissue engineering is a multidisciplinary field encompassing material science, medicine, chemistry and molecular biology aimed to produce a functional graft in vitro as an alternative to allografts and autografts. We explored the microRNAs (miRNAs) that aid in the bone formation process. MiRNAs are small non-coding RNAs of about 17-22 nucleotides in length that target the 3’UTR of mRNAs and represses their expression. MiRNAs have been found to facilitate many processes in the body including development, metabolism, and are implicated in many diseases. Many miRNAs have been identified with roles in osteogenesis, however a large systematic view at miRNA expression throughout osteogenesis that includes early, intermediate and late time points has yet to be done. We aimed to identify the expression profiles of miRNAs that as mesenchymal stem cells underwent osteogenesis with microRNA-sequencing. Most miRNAs were downregulated during osteogenesis and only few were upregulated. With the use of weighted gene correlated gene analysis we identified several expression profiles. Several miRNAs were validated in their osteogenic capabilities by overexpressing and knocking down the miRNAs, then assessing their ALP activities, Alizarin Red and ALP stainings and the expression of osteoblastic markers. In our screen we have identified both miRNAs that have been reported previously and many novel miRNAs with potent osteogenic capabilities. For tissue engineering applications, we then functionalized scaffolds with the miRNAs we identified and observed an increase in osteogenic capabilities in our 3D cultures. Our findings depicted the miRNA expression landscape as mesenchymal stem cells underwent osteogenic differentiation. We also highlight the potency of miRNAs as biological therapeutics in bone tissue engineering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207