MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061409858

A report of the Japan ? Canada Joint Conference on Emergency Triage and Acuity System

2010· article· ja· W7061409858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toyama Repository for Academic Information (University of Toyama) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriageJoint (building)Emergency medical servicesMEDLINEEmergency department
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

救急患者増加と医療現場の疲弊に対する救急医療システムとしての対応策の一つとして救急外来における救急トリアージすなわち患者緊急度判定システムの導入が必要とされている。日本での救急外来トリアージ導入に対する方向性の確認と科学的評価の確立を目的としてカナダアルバータ州エドモントンにおいて日本・カナダ合同緊急度判定支援システム研究学会を開催した。両国より医師,看護師といった医療従事者のみでなく行政の関係者からの参加も得て,救急外来患者トリアージの臨床応用にさいしての普及方策と課題および導入後の成果の評価の重要性について討議された。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toyama Repository for Academic Information (University of Toyama)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207